On 10/07/2012 17:18, Michael Thomas wrote: ... >> Third, maybe we do not need more than one secure .local name server >> in a network that has more than one router. >> > > Seriously, I can see my neighbor's wifi, and I have access to his > (guest) net. This problem is already here.
.local is a problem in exactly the same way that RFC1918 is a problem. For homenet, we should really do better (as ULAs do better than RFC1918). If you want something that walks and talks like a locally defined, locally significant TLD, then that's exactly what you'd better have. So it needs to be .<uniqueString> not .<wellKnownString> Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
