On Jul 30, 2012 4:03 PM, "Michael Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know this is ietf week, but... > > If we believe that ipv6 is ready to go for mass deployment, why do we > not pressure home router vendors to default to sending router advertisements > with ULA addresses that, if necessary, get NAT'd at the border just like > 192.168 space does today. > > I mean, nothing bad would happen, right? >
Correct.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
