In message <[email protected]> Michael Thomas writes: > > On 07/30/2012 05:10 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > If you see some advantage that solves the IPv4 address depletion (a > > big point of the transition to IPv6 exercise), then I've missed it. > > If so, please point out what I missed. > > No, not at all and not the point. I'm just of the mind that if > we believe that v6 is really, really ready to go there shouldn't > be any problem in substituting rfc1918 v4 space with v6 ULA > space. If that modest change leads to trouble... > > Mike
It may yield no benefit except to shake out bugs at customer sites. If so, it would increase support costs for the provider. Grandma's Windows98 machine needs an IPv4 address and without it she can't fetch recipes and read occasional email and run bots in the background. :-) Curtis _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
