In message <[email protected]>, Michael Thomas writes: > I know this is ietf week, but... > > If we believe that ipv6 is ready to go for mass deployment, why do we > not pressure home router vendors to default to sending router advertisements > with ULA addresses that, if necessary, get NAT'd at the border just like > 192.168 space does today. > > I mean, nothing bad would happen, right? > > Mike
Well if you think every piece of software supports HE go for it. If you want to find every piece of software that doesn't support HE go for it. One doesn't need to NAT, just introduce a second prefix when the home is eventually connected. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
