On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Teco Boot <[email protected]> wrote: > But seriously: why are you not comfortable with this idea? We need a > routing protocol for the homenet anyway. A link-state routing protocol can > carry multiple TLVs, including TLVs for DNS servers. Routing protocols can > be authenticated. The devices that need to propagage DNS are likely going > to be home routers. Why not use the routing protocol? > > Because we need this info in all nodes. I'm not sure we shall have > interactions between hosts and the routing protocol. >
You don't need to. You can have interactions between hosts and routers. > Well, let's see. You have an ISP that hands you a DNS server using DHCPv6. > You're also connected to a walled garden that hands you a global but > partitioned IPv6 address that can only reach the walled garden, and gives > you its own DNS server. You want things to work more than one hop away. How > would you implement this? > > BRDP. > The question was not how to make routing work in such a setup, the question was how do you make DNS work such that the walled-garden DNS server (which could return REFUSED for anything not in the walled garden, like NTT's does) is used only for that zone.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
