On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> wrote:
> Using a routing protocol and not using DHCPv6 solves this issue, because a > router is allowed to deprecate a prefix that has gone away even if it was > originally announced by someone else, and NUD will let hosts work around > broken routers in a reasonable amount of time. > Forgot to mention: the presentation I attached (which was given at the homenet meeting in October 2011) tries to do that with RAs and routing protocol only. In many ways it's similar to BRDP. I was going to remove the attachment because I realized that it's already archived - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/current/msg00385.html - but I forgot.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
