Op 8 nov. 2012, om 14:03 heeft Acee Lindem het volgende geschreven:

> 
> On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Teco Boot wrote:
> 
>> I checked the draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-00. I think the proposal 
>> doesn't meet expectations of users, with regard of protocol convergence. The 
>> default timers are far too conservative. First reconfig on OSPF router in my 
>> hands is adjust timers on high speed interfaces to hello=1 and dead=4. This 
>> is a bit better than what old days bridges with STP do.
> 
> This was not considered a requirement in the home. Refer to the section 3.5 
> in the homenet architecture document. 

Right. Dead=40 does *not* meet the requirement.

See also http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/current/msg01245.html

Teco

> 
>> Minor: the timers are not defaults. These are sample values. I have seen 
>> routers with different defaults than RFC 5340, for certain interface types.
> 
> I'd expect homenet ethernet and WiFi interfaces to default to the broadcast 
> type. 
> 
>> 
>> For autoconfig OSPF, I prefer removal of the restriction that all routers on 
>> a link MUST use same timers. That provides flexibility like OLSR. If this is 
>> not possible because of reasons for DR selection, I suggest removal of DR 
>> completely and configure all interfaces in P2MP. Or MANET interface type, if 
>> we want to. Question is: which MANET extension.
> 
> I'm not sure if there is a real requirement. Routers on the link need to 
> agree on the timer values lest we impact more of the protocol than necessary. 
> Hence, if this is required, the way forward would be for routers on shared 
> links to adopt the timers from their neighbor(s). For simplicity, the same 
> rules used for DR preference could be used. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
>> 
>> [posted here, because requirements come from Homenet]
>> 
>> Teco
>> _______________________________________________
>> homenet mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
> 

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to