I noticed it had been reduced from minutes to 30 seconds in this version. I guess that rules out RIPng. Since this is a new specification we'll take lower hello/dead under advisement. However, I doubt we go as low as 1 and 4. Acee On Nov 8, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Teco Boot wrote:
> > Op 8 nov. 2012, om 14:03 heeft Acee Lindem het volgende geschreven: > >> >> On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Teco Boot wrote: >> >>> I checked the draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-00. I think the proposal >>> doesn't meet expectations of users, with regard of protocol convergence. >>> The default timers are far too conservative. First reconfig on OSPF router >>> in my hands is adjust timers on high speed interfaces to hello=1 and >>> dead=4. This is a bit better than what old days bridges with STP do. >> >> This was not considered a requirement in the home. Refer to the section 3.5 >> in the homenet architecture document. > > Right. Dead=40 does *not* meet the requirement. > > See also http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/current/msg01245.html > > Teco > >> >>> Minor: the timers are not defaults. These are sample values. I have seen >>> routers with different defaults than RFC 5340, for certain interface types. >> >> I'd expect homenet ethernet and WiFi interfaces to default to the broadcast >> type. >> >>> >>> For autoconfig OSPF, I prefer removal of the restriction that all routers >>> on a link MUST use same timers. That provides flexibility like OLSR. If >>> this is not possible because of reasons for DR selection, I suggest removal >>> of DR completely and configure all interfaces in P2MP. Or MANET interface >>> type, if we want to. Question is: which MANET extension. >> >> I'm not sure if there is a real requirement. Routers on the link need to >> agree on the timer values lest we impact more of the protocol than >> necessary. Hence, if this is required, the way forward would be for routers >> on shared links to adopt the timers from their neighbor(s). For simplicity, >> the same rules used for DR preference could be used. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >>> >>> [posted here, because requirements come from Homenet] >>> >>> Teco >>> _______________________________________________ >>> homenet mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
