I noticed it had been reduced from minutes to 30 seconds in this version. I 
guess that rules out RIPng.  Since this is a new specification we'll take lower 
hello/dead under advisement. However, I doubt we go as low as 1 and 4. 
Acee 
On Nov 8, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Teco Boot wrote:

> 
> Op 8 nov. 2012, om 14:03 heeft Acee Lindem het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> 
>> On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Teco Boot wrote:
>> 
>>> I checked the draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-00. I think the proposal 
>>> doesn't meet expectations of users, with regard of protocol convergence. 
>>> The default timers are far too conservative. First reconfig on OSPF router 
>>> in my hands is adjust timers on high speed interfaces to hello=1 and 
>>> dead=4. This is a bit better than what old days bridges with STP do.
>> 
>> This was not considered a requirement in the home. Refer to the section 3.5 
>> in the homenet architecture document. 
> 
> Right. Dead=40 does *not* meet the requirement.
> 
> See also http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/current/msg01245.html
> 
> Teco
> 
>> 
>>> Minor: the timers are not defaults. These are sample values. I have seen 
>>> routers with different defaults than RFC 5340, for certain interface types.
>> 
>> I'd expect homenet ethernet and WiFi interfaces to default to the broadcast 
>> type. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> For autoconfig OSPF, I prefer removal of the restriction that all routers 
>>> on a link MUST use same timers. That provides flexibility like OLSR. If 
>>> this is not possible because of reasons for DR selection, I suggest removal 
>>> of DR completely and configure all interfaces in P2MP. Or MANET interface 
>>> type, if we want to. Question is: which MANET extension.
>> 
>> I'm not sure if there is a real requirement. Routers on the link need to 
>> agree on the timer values lest we impact more of the protocol than 
>> necessary. Hence, if this is required, the way forward would be for routers 
>> on shared links to adopt the timers from their neighbor(s). For simplicity, 
>> the same rules used for DR preference could be used. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> 
>>> 
>>> [posted here, because requirements come from Homenet]
>>> 
>>> Teco
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> homenet mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to