Op 8 nov. 2012, om 17:28 heeft Andrew McGregor het volgende geschreven: > > On 8/11/2012, at 11:17 AM, Teco Boot <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Op 8 nov. 2012, om 16:56 heeft Acee Lindem het volgende geschreven: >> >>> I noticed it had been reduced from minutes to 30 seconds in this version. I >>> guess that rules out RIPng. Since this is a new specification we'll take >>> lower hello/dead under advisement. However, I doubt we go as low as 1 and >>> 4. >> >> Values similar to RSTP would be fine; hello=2, dead=6. >> Dead=8 would be more robust, for lost or delayed hello. >> Wait doesn't need an adjustment if we go for less slow hellos. >> >> Teco > > If you end up running this on wireless, remember that wireless multicast > tends to be horribly unreliable. So hello=2 dead=10 is more to the point, > that lets you get the false positive dead router rate down quite a bit.
Yes. This brings us to auto-costs and ETX / ETT. Teco > Andrew _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
