Mikael, Given that we want multiprefix multihoming with multiple prefixes, SADR is pretty much the only solution.
But consesus? Wouldn't dear getting anywhere close to that. :-) Cheers, Ole On 15 Nov 2012, at 16:15, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Ole Trøan wrote: > >>> Or am I missing things again? >> >> no, this is pretty much what we imagined, and what Markus has implemented >> and showed at the IETF. the hosts would still do better if they support rule >> 5.5 when directly connected to the exits. > > Absolutely, 5.5 is a plus and gives one less hop in the path, but at least > the packet will be ultimately delivered to its final destination. > > So with the above "pretty much what we have imagined", is there consensus > that this is the way to go, or this is still being debated? > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
