-----Original Message----- From: Michael Thomas <[email protected]> Date: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:41 AM To: John Jason Brzozowski <[email protected]> Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]>, Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Mark Townsley <[email protected]>, Dave Taht <[email protected]>, Jari Arkko <[email protected]>, "[email protected] Group" <[email protected]>, David Lamparter <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [homenet] Running code in Orlando
>Brzozowski, John wrote: >>>> general? >>> Yes, along with naming, security, prefix delegation across multiple >>> routers, and isp's >>> giving and withdrawing prefixes due to renumbering. I'm dubious that >>>this >>> has happened >>> in real life with networks with people whose day job is to worry about >>> such things, and >>> I'd be astonished to hear such a thing has been shown to work on a home >>> network. >> [jjmb] hmmm we have quite a few real customers that are using IPv6 >>enabled >> on a daily basis mostly using technology that we specified ~8 years ago. >> Does this count? > >Not really because my understanding is that these networks are giving a >service >that is pretty much the same as their v4 counterpart which is completely >client >centric. [jjmb] I disagree it counts, sorry. When you say client centric you mean clients accessing the Internet not accessing the home from the Internet? >I seriously want globally accessible servers on my home network to be >1st class citizens and that implies naming and security/admission control. >The future is now: a Raspberry Pi is $35. Tomorrow, we'll be getting >gratuitous IP-enabled >controllers on everything whether we want them or not just like when >digital controls >replaced analog. > >Mike _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
