Ole Troan wrote: >> My understanding was that they were going to extend mDNS to work on >> multiple segments, rather than gluing mDNS "islands" with DNS... but I >> have not really followed the discussions in the mdnsext. > > see: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid-01 > > cheers, > Ole > > >From the quoted draft: "for the purposes of this document, assume that each link has its own unique Unicast DNS domain name", which I don't think is acceptable in Homenet. I don't want my phone's name to change when I walk out to the shed. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Brzozowski, John
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Fernando Gont
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Fernando Gont
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Brzozowski, John
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Ole Troan
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service Discov... Ole Troan
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service D... Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Servi... Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Servi... Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Servi... Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Servi... Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Service D... Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Servi... Mattia Rossi
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Servi... Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Naming and Servi... Michael Thomas
