Ole Troan wrote:
>> My understanding was that they were going to extend mDNS to work on
>> multiple segments, rather than gluing mDNS "islands" with DNS... but I
>> have not really followed the discussions in the mdnsext.
>
> see:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid-01
>
> cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>From the quoted draft: "for the purposes of this document, assume that
each link has its own unique Unicast DNS domain name",
which I don't think is acceptable in Homenet. I don't want my phone's
name to change when I walk out to the shed.
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to