So far the problem I have seen with authoritative DNS is one still needs to know what to ask for, the benefit of service discovery is what is available is being announced.
Unless I missed something I do not beleive the latter has been part of the discussions specific to authoritative DNS. John ========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable m) 484-962-0060 e) [email protected] o) 609-377-6594 w) www.comcast6.net ========================================= -----Original Message----- From: Fernando Gont <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:05 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [homenet] Naming and Service Discovery >Folks, > >Just to kick some discussion: > >Regarding naming and service discovery, it seems that there are folks >that are in the camp of "let's make mDNS work on multiple segments", >while others seem to be in the camp of "this should be done with DNS". > >May I introduce a third option? mDNS for the local net, DNS to glue the >multiple segments. That way, there's no additional code needed on the >clients, no extensions needed for DNS, and just some software on the >boxes linking the different network segments. > >I could draft something along these lines, if there's interest. > >Thanks, >-- >Fernando Gont >SI6 Networks >e-mail: [email protected] >PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > > > > >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
