In message <[email protected]>, Michael Thomas writes: > On 03/13/2013 03:39 PM, Don Sturek wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > > I think disconnected use is a MUST and not aspirational. > > > > I would not want my networked printer to stop working, my smart appliances > > to not be able to read my meter, etc. all because my ISP decided to do > > some maintenance. > > > > > > Ok, let's assume it's a MUST. That seems to imply that when I'm > at home I want my CER to serve up RR's for my domain, but when > I'm away something in the cloud is serving up my RR's because > I don't want to deal with DoS against my CER, etc, etc. > > I'm not a namedropper, but that doesn't sound like kosher DNS to me... > sort of a weird split horizon.
It is quite common for the stealth masters to exist (not listed in the NS RRset). It is also quite common for recursive servers to have local copies of zones that are in use locally but not be listed in the NS RRset. The update protocol supports forwarding of signed UPDATE requests where the forwarding server does NOT have the shared secret. homenet <> CER (master) <> listed authoritative servers <> rest of the world Now if you want this to work with the CER turned off while you are away and update to the zone to work then protocol work is needed to get multi-master working. > Mike > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
