Hi, On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0200, Pierre Pfister wrote: > So even if most will agree that supporting multiple routing protocol is a > madness in the general case. > It?s not that hard to ?support it? while requiring one single routing > protocol as mandatory in home networks. > And whenever we want to move to another protocol, maybe in 20 years, it will > allow transitioning softly.
Having multiple routing protocols and select between them is already
permitted by the current HNCP draft (for example).
The question was more whether "add ISIS today" would bring a benefit to
homenet, and I still maintain "no" - to the contrary, it is harmful - as
you said, we can be happy if CPE vendors get one protocol right.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpYK9pme44W4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
