Hello Benoit, Looks like ANIMA’s goals are quite similar to Homenet’s indeed. Please allow me to comment the charter.
1. Why would you put the ‘negociation protocol’ in the charter (even last call in the milestones !) ? It seems fair to me that discussions about what should be the approach and solution happen after the WG creation, isn’t it ? 2. "A solution for distributed IPv6 prefix management within a network." -> Please have a look to HNCP (draft-ietf-homenet-hncp) + Prefix Assignment Algorithm (draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignement). Ha, and we have running open-source code for all this as well: https://github.com/sbyx/hnetd. 3. "A solution for always-on, data plane independent connectivity between network elements (i.e., stable in the case of mis-configurations)." Sure the ‘data plane independent’ makes it a little bit more buzzy. But in the end this pretty much looks like the problem routing protocols are made to solve (The 'mis-configurations’ part is more about point 2.). Regards, - Pierre Le 1 oct. 2014 à 15:20, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> a écrit : > Dear all, > > Based on the previous UCAN BoF, we are considering having an ANIMA WG: > Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach > This is now a proposed charter, under consideration by the IESG. > This is your chance to provide feedback on > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/anima/charter/ > Note also that a BoF has been requested, just in case. > Since HOMENET was mentioned during the UCAN BoF, I thought of double-checking > with you guys. > > Regards, Benoit > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
