Pierre, On 02/10/2014 02:58, Pierre Pfister wrote: > Hello Benoit, > > Looks like ANIMA’s goals are quite similar to Homenet’s > indeed.
Except that homenet has a limited scope and is well advanced in its work. > Please allow me to comment the charter. > > 1. Why would you put the ‘negociation protocol’ in the > charter (even last call in the milestones !) ? It seems fair > to me that discussions about what should be the approach and > solution happen after the WG creation, isn’t it ? Not really. The details are all to be discussed of course, but the concept is fundamental to autonomics: devices talk to each other rather than receiving instructions from above. (As Rene Struik has pointed out, there is another way to look at it, state synchronization, but that's largely a difference of terminology.) > > 2. "A solution for distributed IPv6 prefix management within > a network." -> Please have a look to HNCP > (draft-ietf-homenet-hncp) + Prefix Assignment Algorithm > (draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignement). Ha, and we have > running open-source code for all this as well: > https://github.com/sbyx/hnetd. Yes, in the homenet context. It's a bit different in the carrier context. What we are really after is a general mechanism for the future. If we miss the homenet boat, that's our fault for starting late. There is a lot to learn from homenet, in my opinion. > > 3. "A solution for always-on, data plane independent > connectivity between network elements (i.e., stable in the > case of mis-configurations)." Sure the ‘data plane > independent’ makes it a little bit more buzzy. But in the end > this pretty much looks like the problem routing protocols are > made to solve (The 'mis-configurations’ part is more about > point 2.). Yes, for the problem that routing protocols solve, they do a good job. But we are talking about all the problems that routing protocols don't solve. Brian > > > Regards, > > - Pierre > > > Le 1 oct. 2014 à 15:20, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> Dear all, >> >> Based on the previous UCAN BoF, we are considering having >> an ANIMA WG: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and >> Approach This is now a proposed charter, under >> consideration by the IESG. This is your chance to provide >> feedback on http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/anima/charter/ >> Note also that a BoF has been requested, just in case. >> Since HOMENET was mentioned during the UCAN BoF, I thought >> of double-checking with you guys. >> >> Regards, Benoit >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ homenet >> mailing list [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ homenet > mailing list [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
