On Oct 22, 2014, at 5:00 PM, James Woodyatt <[email protected]> wrote: > My point is that it doesn't need to be done that way unless HOMENET forces > that design choice.
The scenario you are describing sounds like it's secondary. Yes, it's a valid use case, but homenets working right is a use case that will see wider deployment. Federating home networks is certainly an interesting idea, but it seems even more bleeding edge than homenets. I can think of a lot of nice ways to approach the problem. I agree that if homenets use ULAs the way we're discussing, that constrains your choices, but I am confident that the remaining choices are not only adequate, but good. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
