>> If we carry NAT over to IPV6, then shame on us.

> I am sorry, I no longer share this opinion [...]  The next version of
> cerowrt will do translation from the external IPv6 address range to
> a static internal one (or ones, in the case of multiple egress
> gateways),

(Insert strong expression of disagreement here.  Use any means available
to convince Dave otherwise, including flattery, threats, demagoguery, ad
hominem attacks and photographs of cute animals.)

-- Juliusz

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to