In message <[email protected]> Christian Hopps writes: > Hi homenet-wg, > > One thing that has been mentioned to me is that IS-IS could be used > (with proper TLV additions) to completely replace HNCP, if IS-IS were > used as the homenet protocol. If true should we be calling this out > more explicitly in the document? > > Thanks, > Chris.
Chris, Yes. I agree. And OSPF could do the same, without dragging CLNP in with it. Maybe ISIS-WG should consider an ISIS-over-IP draft? Oh wait - non-routability of CLNP is a security feature - so don't forget to mention that in the security section. You might need providers to use filters at borders and GTSM as they do for OSPF. Curtis _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
