Hi,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 07:33:47AM -0500, Christian Hopps wrote:
> One thing that has been mentioned to me is that IS-IS could be used (with
> proper TLV additions) to completely replace HNCP, if IS-IS were used as the
> homenet protocol. If true should we be calling this out more explicitly in
> the document?
I'm sure we could, but "what is it that the WG wants?"
- achieve something that vendors could deploy, in finite time
- do another few rounds on protocols, variations, personal peeves, and
end up with something like IPSEC?
I'm firmly in the "do something that is good enough, and get it deployed"
camp, which means "no, we don't do everything-on-top-of-ISIS".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
