>> My (perhaps mistaken) feeling is that whenever I mention an important >> feature of Babel, there's a chorus of "that could be done in IS-IS, we >> just haven't done it yet". I've tried to explain that many of the >> things that Babel is doing are difficult or outright impossible in IS-IS
> it should be clear that the work necessary is engineering and not research. Without a strict requirement for implementation experience and empirical data, there is nothing preventing people from claiming "it's just a matter of engineering". -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
