WG, In reviewing the posts on this thread over the last several days, I note that no-one spoke strenuously against the Design Team (DT) as chartered. There were several emails that implied support of the DT, and many others seeking conditions that the DT take on board comments for their review.
The DT will be chartered as below. I will advise the DT to review this thread and to take on board the comments that are germane to their work of selecting the mandatory to implement HOMENET routing protocol. Thank you for all your comments! I urge the WG to now focus on the work ahead, and wait patiently for the DT response in Prague. Cheers Terry On 1/04/2015 1:12 am, "Terry Manderson" <[email protected]> wrote: > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >Homenet's architecture (RFC 7368) articulates the general features >required. The working group has agreed that a single routing protocol >must be identified as mandatory to implement. The final purpose of >this design team is to select and present a single routing protocol >with a summary of the necessary extensions and work to be the one that >is mandatory to implement. Once the design team has made its >recommendation, the working group will consider any substantial >technical objections (see RFC 7282) as part of gaining consensus. > >For the design team to make this determination, it shall first >understand the use-cases for homenet and derive routing requirements >from those. Then it shall compare these routing requirements to >candidate routing protocols and examine the gaps in each. For each >highly plausible candidate routing protocol, the design team will >estimate the work and actions needed, the resources at hand >or reasonably available, and the associated timeline to get >an acceptable, full, standardized solution using each protocol. >Based upon this information and the perceived market timing >needs of the technology, the design team will make its selection. >The requirements, gaps, and reasoning will be documented. > >This document should be delivered by the July 2015 IETF. > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >So with no more emails on the thread, I'm marking the above as the final >design team charter and I now ask the WG to comment by midnight Friday the >3rd April (UTC) of either accepting the design team, or not. I will judge >consensus at that point, remembering that silence doesn't help. > > >Pending consensus, and at the appropriate time I will direct the design >team to read the advice from Steven, Alexandru, and James posted here for >their consideration.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
