Dear HOMENET WG, Apologies if this email reaches your inbox while you are traveling.
I thought it worthwhile to keep you apprised of some immediate action
following the meeting on Wednesday, and a process direction I am going to
follow.
Firstly, I have asked Ray Bellis (HOMENET co-chair) to join the Design
Team (DT) to aid in communicating the HOMENET perspective. I have also
asked
Russ as the DT chair to seek out an additional participant who has deep
and broad expertise in routing.
Secondly, I am asking the DT to seek clarifications from the workgroup on
the routing requirements as highlighted on Wednesday. This will output a
draft that HOMENET might consider adopting as a WG item to improve its
document state and universal understanding.
My drive here is to follow due process in reaching a point where the DT
can, by Yokohama, either:
- make a defensible recommendation based on the already stated criteria
or
- present a summary of why a single selection cannot be made at this
time.
While this seems like a delay, I will be speaking with the WG chairs on
the implications.
In the meantime I hope you continue your development work, continually
reflect on the state of code versus specification, and work hard on
interop efforts, and gain more experience.
Thanks
Terry
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
