> One group sees the homenet consisting of a bunch of "ad-hoc" wifi links > with dubious quality and working part of the time,
Mikael, Perhaps we could stop caricaturing each other's positions? I'm sure we'll enjoy each other's company much more that way. I'm not going to repeat my explanation here, I refer you to Section 7 of draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparision-02. > which a linkstate protcol such as ISIS can handle just fine. Similar things have been done in link-state protocols. I refer you to * Section 14 of RFC 3626; * http://www.olsr.org/docs/README-Link-Quality.html , which improves on the above; * http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/grid/mobicom03-mark-II.ppt , which describes the algorithm on which both the above and Appendix A.2.2 of RFC 6126 are based; * draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric , a simplified version of ETT proposed by Henning. I believe that David Lamparter understands this stuff, I suggest you speak to him. > There will be ISIS "homenet compliant" code by yokohama that has passed > commercially available ISIS compliancy testing suites, Excellent. Now that we finally have a useful IS-IS spec (thanks, David), we can communicate. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
