Hi Mark, I'm not sure which hat you are wearing here - so I will presume none.
On 25/07/2015 5:40 am, "Mark Townsley" <m...@townsley.net> wrote: > >Thank you Terry, Russ, et. al., for agreeing to continue to work on this >with closer participation from folks involved closely in Homenet since >day one by including Ray. I'd suggest including a few open source >implementors as well: David Lampeter, Stephen > Barth, and Juliusz all come to mind if any would be so willing. To get >additional operator viewpoint, perhaps Mikael Abrahamsson, John >Brzozowski, and Barbara Stark. You might tap Hans Liu from D-Link as >well. Perhaps even a call to the WG list for willing > contributors. I will not be adding further people (other than stated) to the design team, should the design team need to reach out to the folks above for clarifications - they are free to do so. > >I would like to echo here something I heard at the microphone on >Wednesday: that the DT deliberations be more transparent, including at >least read only access to the DT mailing list. The plan to produce an >internet draft before Yokohama rather unveiling > a powerpoint during the meeting itself is definitely a step in the right >direction as well. I will consider the request. > >Last but not least, I recall rather strong consensus that the WG not be >hindered by the Routing Protocol Selection debate. As such, I would like >ensure that we can continue to double down on moving forward our >existing, non-routing-protocol, work. Terry, > if you have any objection to that, please let us know now. Yes, the WG should make efforts to move forward on in-charter, non-routing-protocol work, and further ensure any decisions made are by consensus. Thanks Terry
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
