On Jul 26, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > And what makes you think I do not understand the context? > I attended last Homenet WG in Dallas and then joined the list. So I've been > reading the list for 3 months and catching up on all documents.
Then you probably remember just how unhelpful and un-illuminating the discussion at the microphone was in Dallas. This working group has been discussing the routing protocol problem for several years, and at this point there seems to be very little constructive discussion going on, so it is unfortunately not surprising that despite having participated for the last three months, you do not know why the working group can’t reach consensus to just use IS-IS. Based on the experience with the DT, it’s clear that some of the points that are made in the homenet architecture document were not sufficiently clear. However, all of these points have been discussed by the working group over the past four years, and the lack of clarity in the document is not the result of a lack of clarity on the part of the working group; indeed, probably just the opposite. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
