On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Hemant Singh (shemant) <[email protected]> wrote: > (a) A routing protocol to use on the wired link at home
No. There are multiple links, some wired, some wireless. The whole point of homenet is to get past “the link” or “the wired link and the wireless link”. If we just wanted to handle “the link,” we already have an RFC that adequately addresses that use case. > (b) Whatever routing is used on the wired link should also support the lossy > wifi link in the home. No. There may be wifi links in the home used as transit links, and those have to work even if propagation is not 99.999%. > (c) An average home has one wifi link. No. > Based on the requirements above, I would use ISIS for (a) and configure a > static route to the wifi link to deal with (b). And you would have failed to address the problem that that homenet set out to solve.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
