David Oran <[email protected]> wrote:
    > What you describe isn't often on the timescales of the distributed
    > protocols. A human can only plug and unplug things on timescales of
    > seconds, not milliseconds, and I think Dino was referring to
    > high-fequency non-human events that can cause links and boxes to flap.

I mostly agree; my experience in enterprises is that OSPF could deal with
human-scale cable plugging, but that stock-STP could not. (RSTP could be
tuned to deal, but not all vendors gave me enough knobs: which is why we used
OSPF).

But, Dino's original query didn't specify a time scale.

    > I can't say for certain, but my old ISIS code would certainly not be
    > unhappy with up/down events on the order of one every second or a few
    > seconds.

Took me awhile to parse the double negative to say:
     my old ISIS code would certainly be happy with up/down events on the
     order of one every second or a few seconds.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to