It has to be possible to type it.   "hm.arpa" would be amusing.   I
think that if we are going to have to live with no secure delegations
from the root, which I really can't argue with, then we need to have a
securely-delegated TLD that is _not_ .arpa for stuff like this.   I
think the point raised about .arpa is unfortunately somewhat
legitimate.   .alt will have to be securely delegated also, but it
doesn't have a registry so it won't help with this use case.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Michael Richardson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]> wrote:
>     > As I said at the mic yesterday: a second-level name under .arpa avoids
>     > this registry authority problem altogether. I understand the concern
>     > that the resulting names are ugly, but the policy authority over .arpa
>
> And we could have something as ridiculously short as "h.arpa", right?
> Could we have: 🏠.arpa ?
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to