Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]> wrote: > As I said at the mic yesterday: a second-level name under .arpa avoids > this registry authority problem altogether. I understand the concern > that the resulting names are ugly, but the policy authority over .arpa
And we could have something as ridiculously short as "h.arpa", right? Could we have: 🏠.arpa ? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
