Hi Mark, I think yes: a Hackpad to have something flexible during the meetings, and once stabilized we can put that in the OSM Wiki. Thoughts?
Sincerely, Severin On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Mark Cupitt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Severin > > Is it worth creating a Hackpad for the agenda and points to be raised? > > Cheers > > Mark > > > Regards > > Mark Cupitt > > "If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence" > > See me on Open StreetMap <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt> > > See me on LinkedIn <http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt> > > > *See me on StackExchange <http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c>* > > > =============================================================================================== > The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom > it is addressed and may contain > confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended > recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, > or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in > error, please notify the sender immediately and > delete the email and any attachments. > =============================================================================================== > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Severin Menard > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Among the reactivated Working Groups, here is the Activation Working >> Group. Activations are more and more numerous and successful with a >> increasing number of contributors. The results are really impressive, but >> we can certainly do even better. >> >> As for the Communication Working group (for those interested, please fill >> ASAP its Doodle <http://doodle.com/3545epmy63x72gvk>) we could start >> with a kick-off meeting on >> Mumble<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mumble>, >> and here is a Doodle to set it: >> >> http://doodle.com/hpwkwqiregdi7b6i <http://doodle.com/hpwkwqiregdi7b6i> >> >> This meeting and the ones that will follow aim at being a time to >> exchange on this thrilling topic, review the experiences, documents, >> procedures and set goals to be achieved for the next meeting. Because yes, >> a Working Group is a group that works, that means between the meetings. And >> actually, it is already happening: eg there are (more and more) people >> working on data validation, both through setting procedures and monitoring >> the freshly created data. >> >> I see 4 main topics around the Activation (but would be pleased to get >> other suggestions): >> >> 1. All the *activities* and *documents* involved in an Activation. In >> the past the Activation Working Groups mostly focused on how Activations >> are triggered and start, what we could review based on the last >> experiences. Crisis monitoring is certainly something we could add, in >> order not to forget crisis of smaller range or simply not highly covered by >> the medias. Also technical aspects like: define and prioritize AOIs (Areas >> of Interests) and mapping goals, track and monitor the mapping progresses, >> and set thin, flexible and efficient processes, tools, and wiki templates, >> etc. But also share and document how to maintain and even grow the >> contribution of the OSM contributors and communities, by communicating with >> them (like this Working Group will do), proposing more different kinds of >> tasks to do or setting joint events. >> >> 2. The *beneficiaries*, that means the humanitarian stakeholders. We >> need both to make them aware of the data we produce and to make the data >> useful and easy to use for them, taking more into account their needs, >> constraints and tools. I got recent feedback from the GIS officers in the >> UN that I will share. >> >> 3. The *data*. What needs to be mapped is quite known, but how to do it >> to make it as clean and efficient as possible. That links to the mapping >> instructions and the >> validation<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Tasking_Manager/Validating_data>but >> also to how the data can be reused by the humanitarian stakeholders. >> There a lot of potential improvements to propose not only raw data but eg >> thematic dataset, what the HOT Exports can already potentially provide (in >> link with the Technical Working Group). >> >> 4. Last, but really not least is to *make more OSM contributors know* about >> the procedures and tools used to map, monitor, communicate and activate an >> OSM community, and expand the number of contributors in the Activations, >> according to everyone's interest(s). This implies connecting with local OSM >> communities when possible, talk with them and provide them documentation >> and online training. Eg in Lubumbashi after Jorieke's stay, the contact >> with the local OSM community has been maintained and voluntary online >> training has been and will be provided through Mumble. So now, they are >> continuing the mapping (see https://twitter.com/OSM_L) and will take an >> active part on the Mapping in London on Saturday. And if ever a crisis >> unfortunately hits Lubumbashi in the future, they will be able to trigger >> the worldwide OSM community >> >> >> Exciting, isn't it? And actually a lot of topics and sub-topics. And some >> are certainly missing. This is why this Activation Working Group will not >> need one leader but several facilitators, who, by their experience, skills >> and will, will make things go ahead on the topic(s) they care. >> >> Let us make things move on and activate the AWG! >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Severin >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
