Hi Mark, Please do
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Mark Cupitt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Severin, I agree totally, If you would like me to create it, just let > me know. Cheers Mark > > > Regards > > Mark Cupitt > > "If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence" > > See me on Open StreetMap <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt> > > See me on LinkedIn <http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt> > > > *See me on StackExchange <http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c>* > > > =============================================================================================== > The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom > it is addressed and may contain > confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended > recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, > or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in > error, please notify the sender immediately and > delete the email and any attachments. > =============================================================================================== > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Severin Menard > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> I think yes: a Hackpad to have something flexible during the meetings, >> and once stabilized we can put that in the OSM Wiki. Thoughts? >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Severin >> >> >> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Mark Cupitt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Severin >>> >>> Is it worth creating a Hackpad for the agenda and points to be raised? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Mark Cupitt >>> >>> "If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence" >>> >>> See me on Open StreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt> >>> >>> See me on LinkedIn <http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt> >>> >>> >>> *See me on StackExchange >>> <http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c>* >>> >>> >>> =============================================================================================== >>> The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to >>> whom it is addressed and may contain >>> confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, >>> or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in >>> error, please notify the sender immediately and >>> delete the email and any attachments. >>> =============================================================================================== >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Severin Menard <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Among the reactivated Working Groups, here is the Activation Working >>>> Group. Activations are more and more numerous and successful with a >>>> increasing number of contributors. The results are really impressive, but >>>> we can certainly do even better. >>>> >>>> As for the Communication Working group (for those interested, please >>>> fill ASAP its Doodle <http://doodle.com/3545epmy63x72gvk>) we could >>>> start with a kick-off meeting on >>>> Mumble<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mumble>, >>>> and here is a Doodle to set it: >>>> >>>> http://doodle.com/hpwkwqiregdi7b6i <http://doodle.com/hpwkwqiregdi7b6i> >>>> >>>> This meeting and the ones that will follow aim at being a time to >>>> exchange on this thrilling topic, review the experiences, documents, >>>> procedures and set goals to be achieved for the next meeting. Because yes, >>>> a Working Group is a group that works, that means between the meetings. And >>>> actually, it is already happening: eg there are (more and more) people >>>> working on data validation, both through setting procedures and monitoring >>>> the freshly created data. >>>> >>>> I see 4 main topics around the Activation (but would be pleased to get >>>> other suggestions): >>>> >>>> 1. All the *activities* and *documents* involved in an Activation. In >>>> the past the Activation Working Groups mostly focused on how Activations >>>> are triggered and start, what we could review based on the last >>>> experiences. Crisis monitoring is certainly something we could add, in >>>> order not to forget crisis of smaller range or simply not highly covered by >>>> the medias. Also technical aspects like: define and prioritize AOIs (Areas >>>> of Interests) and mapping goals, track and monitor the mapping progresses, >>>> and set thin, flexible and efficient processes, tools, and wiki templates, >>>> etc. But also share and document how to maintain and even grow the >>>> contribution of the OSM contributors and communities, by communicating with >>>> them (like this Working Group will do), proposing more different kinds of >>>> tasks to do or setting joint events. >>>> >>>> 2. The *beneficiaries*, that means the humanitarian stakeholders. We >>>> need both to make them aware of the data we produce and to make the data >>>> useful and easy to use for them, taking more into account their needs, >>>> constraints and tools. I got recent feedback from the GIS officers in the >>>> UN that I will share. >>>> >>>> 3. The *data*. What needs to be mapped is quite known, but how to do >>>> it to make it as clean and efficient as possible. That links to the mapping >>>> instructions and the >>>> validation<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Tasking_Manager/Validating_data>but >>>> also to how the data can be reused by the humanitarian stakeholders. >>>> There a lot of potential improvements to propose not only raw data but eg >>>> thematic dataset, what the HOT Exports can already potentially provide (in >>>> link with the Technical Working Group). >>>> >>>> 4. Last, but really not least is to *make more OSM contributors know* about >>>> the procedures and tools used to map, monitor, communicate and activate an >>>> OSM community, and expand the number of contributors in the Activations, >>>> according to everyone's interest(s). This implies connecting with local OSM >>>> communities when possible, talk with them and provide them documentation >>>> and online training. Eg in Lubumbashi after Jorieke's stay, the contact >>>> with the local OSM community has been maintained and voluntary online >>>> training has been and will be provided through Mumble. So now, they are >>>> continuing the mapping (see https://twitter.com/OSM_L) and will take >>>> an active part on the Mapping in London on Saturday. And if ever a crisis >>>> unfortunately hits Lubumbashi in the future, they will be able to trigger >>>> the worldwide OSM community >>>> >>>> >>>> Exciting, isn't it? And actually a lot of topics and sub-topics. And >>>> some are certainly missing. This is why this Activation Working Group will >>>> not need one leader but several facilitators, who, by their experience, >>>> skills and will, will make things go ahead on the topic(s) they care. >>>> >>>> Let us make things move on and activate the AWG! >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> >>>> Severin >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> HOT mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
