>It's definitely useful to save actual mapper's time. For validation I'm not sure it would be a big help.
I must be missing something. Mapswipe uses four passes and then we get different sized tiles out of it. We still need an old fashioned mapper to map the tile. Traditionally if a mapper thought the tile size was too big they would split it to give different sized tiles. How does it save mapper time? Does that take into account the four passes that mapswipe uses first? On the validation side really all you need is to inspect the tile and say its OK. If the tile is good enough you don't need to add anything. From a practical point of view a conventional validator could do it in one pass provided we trusted them. You'd still want to run JOSM for things like duplicate segments, crossing ways etc but that's faster than having to do a visual inspection as well. Cheerio John On 26 March 2017 at 10:46, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's definitely useful to save actual mapper's time. For validation I'm > not sure it would be a big help. > > Op 26 mrt. 2017 3:12 p.m. schreef "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>: > > Would we be better ahead by using something like mapswipe to validate? If >> a tile is OK there is no need to add to the map from the tool. If three >> mappers tick it then I would say its good to go. >> >> The current system we use four mappers to mapswipe, then a conventional >> mapper to map followed by a validator. Six passes to get a validated >> tile. The other way would give you one in four passes three of which would >> be on smartphones. >> >> Cheerio John >> >> On 26 March 2017 at 09:01, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> But does it address the concern about how much effort is expended >>> compared to the value added? >>> >>> Cheerio John >>> >>> On 26 March 2017 at 08:44, Ralf Stephan <gtrw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Search is your friend. Searching for Mapswipe yields eg >>>> http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/2521 >>>> where clearly the tiles are preselected. Also the description: "The >>>> data are prepared by MapSwipe" >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:40 PM john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I seem to recall the same area is mapswiped by four different people >>>>> before a mapper maps it. >>>>> >>>>> Other than the size of the tile or which area to give priority to I >>>>> think the advantage is that people can do it anywhere on a smartphone. >>>>> >>>>> I would hesitate to say if it is worth doing or not. In future there >>>>> might be a way to bring something into OSM via a review process. >>>>> >>>>> Cheerio John >>>>> >>>>> On 26 March 2017 at 08:22, Hakuch <hak...@posteo.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 26.03.2017 14:13, john whelan wrote: >>>>> > My understanding is that mapswipe is only used to identify where to >>>>> map. >>>>> > Not to contribute to the map. >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheerio John >>>>> >>>>> of course there is no data transmitted to OSM, but how is the data (I >>>>> mean, marked tiles) used after I transmitted it? How much is it worth >>>>> to >>>>> do that mapswiping? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> HOT mailing list >>>>> HOT@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> HOT@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >>
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
