Hi Rafael, I see your point about the CoC and ownership of the list. But that was only the third paragraph of Dale's email.
The fact remains that a person was told they are one of a hated group of people and left the list. It's a loss. Are we comfortable with that? Is it just the way it is and everyone has to live with it? Personally, I am not comfortable with it and welcome further discussion. Cheers, Pete On 15 Dec 2017 18:24, "Rafael Avila Coya" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Dan: > > The thing here is that [email protected] is, as far as I know, an OSM > mailing list, not HOT US inc.'s. I would find it weard that another OSM > mailing list was governed by the Red Cross, and that talk-es was governed > by the Spanish Government, for example. > > Cheers, > > Rafael. > > On 15/12/17 19:11, Dan S wrote: > >> Hi >> >> It does seem to me that more clarity would be good here, i.e. slightly >> disentangling the lines of accountability regarding the hot@ mailing >> list. >> >> Mikel's response has logical sense, but it's probably not clear to the >> average participant in the hot@ mailing list whether they are >> automatically made a part of the HOT community. Whether the best >> clarification is to have two mailing lists, or for the info page >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot> to make clear whether >> it is in general governed by HOT's rules, I don't know. >> >> Best >> Dan >> >> > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
