Walker, thank you for that. It's an interesting approach, and in fact I've 
just had someone else suggest use of "ref". Would be interesting to see how 
many others have used this approach, will keep you posted.
Best regards, Kevin


    On Sunday, April 7, 2019, 6:11:16 PM GMT+1, Walker Kosmidou-Bradley 
<wkosmidoubrad...@worldbank.org> wrote:  
 
 Dear Kevin,
In many countries, the country designations are mapped to the OSM conventions 
and then the Main, District, or Local to which you allude could be a part of 
the ref/number.  Afghanistan has a pretty simple process to go from from OSM to 
national data (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Afghanistan) 
please note that this highway tag list was adapted from the fine work done for 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa.
In Afghanistan, the government knows that OSM secondary roads are “district 
roads” and the ref number reflects that, e.g. D320781 (Secondary) and NH1010 
(Trunk), Afghanistan doesn’t use the motorway designation from OSM.  If they 
need to change the tag after downloading, a simple if/than script can make the 
adjustment in a couple minutes.
I’m happy to learn more how other folks have tackled this issue.

Best,
Walker
On Apr 7, 2019, at 21:30, Kevin McPherson via HOT <hot@openstreetmap.org> wrote:


[External]
Dear all, I am new to this HOT interface on OSM, but joined last week, and 
interested in road classification in OSM. This is my first posting, and first 
time I have engaged with anyone on OSM, so am still getting up to speed.

"Road Classification" is an important topic for roads agencies, it helps define 
the funding and prioritisation for development and maintenance of the road 
network in a country.
With regards to OSM, one issue is that the <highway> tag in OSM is never quite 
the same as the official definition of the country. For example, the highway 
tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
uses "Motorway", "Trunk", "Primary", "Secondary" etc. while a national roads 
agency might use other terminology such as "Main", "District", "Local" etc.

What this means is that the road network classification in OSM is never quite 
the same as that used by the Roads Agency, and there are discrepancies between 
the "official" data of the roads agency, and the OSM definition. This causes 
confusion to anyone who wants accurate mapping.

As part of my work, I am trying to encourage Roads Agencies to review OSM 
mapping, to compare with their official definitions, and to update OSM based on 
their own records. However, the differences in the classification terminologies 
are a barrier to this. Every country potentially has a different classification 
system. We have been discussing internally that an extra "layer" on top of OSM 
might be a way forward, but that is an overhead and requires extra cost and 
administration.
Would be grateful for anyone's views on this.
Regards, Kevin McPherson




On Saturday, April 6, 2019, 3:34:19 PM GMT+1, Ralf Bernhardt <raa...@gmx.de> 
wrote:


My point this time is not the classification of a few roads. What I learn from 
this, is that our data is processed and reviewed again. If a mapping error is 
detected by local staff, it will most likely only be reported to their own 
mapping department. It will also only be fixed locally. We as mappers or 
validators will never learn from this process. All errors will remain in the 
OSM Database. That might be understandable in an emergency situation like now.  
But without direct feedback from map users we will never improve. We should 
also demand that more local knowledge will be shared with OSM. A simple thank 
you is not enough.

Ralf

On 06.04.19 13:29, John Whelan wrote:


There is another wiki guide 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

both get updated from time to time.  As a general rule of thumb I tag highways 
between settlements as unclassified not track, I leave it to the local mappers 
to say if it is a higher classification.  Occasionally I'll tag as high as 
tertiary. Normally I leave the tags alone but have been known to retag 
motorways between two small settlements as unclassified.

I think step one is to get something mapped.  Step two is correct it and with 
lots of new mappers with different ideas we'll always see some problems.

Cheerio John 

Frans Schutz wrote on 2019-04-06 6:27 AM:

Hello Ralf 

you pinpoint to a situation which is not always clear. 
First of all. we ty to keep ourselves to the East African Highway tagging wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

Different mappers judge different how to tag a highway. Out of my own 
experience lots of mappers (and validators) struggle with how to tag a highway. 
 Looking to the importance, the routing, and the width of the highway, which is 
hard to measure from a satellite image, we have to decide. A big number of new 
mappers are joining us and have different ideas (nor no idea at all) how to tag 
a highway. I've seen taggings as secondary highway as a connection to 2 hamlets 
and so on. So we try to tag as good as possible, but often it is a 
(calculated)guess which tag is relevant. Take also in account that there is a 
huge time pressure on these disaster mapping projects, so sometimes you accept 
the tagging as they were made. When there is no time pressure you can take a 
look to each highway and decide. 
I hope you get an understanding how we have to deal with this subject. 
Best regards 
Frans Schutz 
Validator 



Op 5-4-2019 om 20:10 schreef Ralf Bernhardt: 

Interesting when compared to the openstreetmap data. 

There are many POIs I would like to see on Openstreetmap too, also 
boundarys and place names. 

I also noticed a different tagging scheme: Car, Moto and Foot. I would 
guess that Roads not passable for a car but by foot and moto should be 
highway=path in OSM. 

But most of them are still tagged as unclassified or residential. Is 
there a reason for that or will you change them later? 

_______________________________________________ 
HOT mailing list 
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot




-- 
Sent from Postbox_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

  
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to