According to Lachlan Andrew: > Finally, the "current status" emails refer to problems > numbers which don't match the SourceForge problem numbers. > Where can I find the original numbering?
Unless we can get the original bug reports from the old database, these pieced together descriptions from old e-mail references will have to do... PR#348 was fixed in 3.1.3. Missing or invalid port number will get set correctly. I can't find an old e-mail giving more details, but I think the bug is fixed in 3.2 as well, unless something similar was reopened by all the changes to URL.cc. PR#648 was fixed in 3.1.4. Its most relevant e-mail is this... > According to Geoff Hutchison: > > >At 8:41 AM -0700 9/20/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >I hope it's not a big problem to include the keyword statement into > > > >the pagelist > > > >variable. > > > > > >No, but it's definitely a bug. It won't make 3.1.3, which I'm > > >releasing tonight. Sorry. > > There are a few other problems with inconsistent handling of input parameters, > but this seems to be the most troublesome one. It's an ugly hack, but until > this problem is fixed, I think you can make sure the keywords parameter > gets propagated in followups by putting this attribute in your config file: > > allow_in_form: keywords > > It's really meant for allowing input parameters to override config attributes, > but a nice side effect of it is the listed input parameters get propagated. I can't find any e-mail that includes the text of PR#650, but the STATUS file has a synopsis: If exact isn't specified in the search_algorithms, $(WORDS) is not set correctly. Subject: Re: Meta Description incorrectly flagged (PR#859) > At 1:51 PM -0400 6/11/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In the db.worddump file, (created with htdig -t) the value in the > >"flags" column for words that appears in the meta description tags is the same > >as that for those in title. > > > >The flags column is "2". Shouldn't this be "16" as defined in > >HtWordReference.h? > > Yes, this is correct. I'll have to hunt through and find out where it > is set incorrectly. HtWordReference.h attempts to resolve the > confusion in the code between META descriptions and ht://Dig's use of > "description" to mean the link text. > > -Geoff Hope this helps. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
