Just a thought, but may the problem be related to:
General Access Method Changes:
6. Fix a bug in which DB-managed memory returned by a DB->get or
DB->put call may be corrupted by a later cursor call. [#3576]
? My suspicion comes since mp_cmpr_alloc calls get() and Jim's
example shows that it can recursively burrow further than we'd like.
It is still taking me forever to understand all the code/changes...
Cheers,
Lachlan
On Monday 10 March 2003 17:57, Neal Richter wrote:
> I did however look at over snapshots of BDB
> (http://www.sleepycat.com/download/patchlogs.shtml)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
htdig-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
