On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 15:05 +0100, sebb wrote: > Just something to consider: > > Is the project going to have sufficient members to sustain it as a TLP > long-term? >
I am well aware of increased risks that being a TLP implies, hence our (and my) long resistance to this idea. That's why I see 6 PMC members as an absolute minimum. At the same time this whole Jakarta saga has been draining too much of our rather limited cycles. Severing the remaining links with whatever is left of Jakarta seems like a lesser evil to me. Oleg > At present there seem to be just about enough members, but if one or > two drop out then there would not be sufficient to run the TLP - > though it might still be viable as part of another TLP. > > I'm not saying don't do it, just be aware of the additional > requirements that being a TLP involves. > > +0 from me. > > Sebastian > On 23/05/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm +1 to HttpComponents being a TLP. > > > > On 5/23/07, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > I can't help feeling that being a part of Jakarta has become a liability > > > for the project given the latest discussions on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I > > > simply could not care less if Commons becomes Jakarta then becomes > > > Commons or Jakarta becomes Commons then becomes Jakarta or some other > > > twisted combination of the two. > > > > > > I am afraid our hand has been forced. We have no other option but > > > seriously consider moving elsewhere. If no one speaks against it, I > > > would like to put together a draft TLP resolution and ask existing ASF > > > committers if anyone would be interested in being on HttpComponents PMC > > > and overseeing the project. If we got at least 6 to 8 volunteers we > > > could go ahead with the TLP proposal. If not, we could still consider > > > asking Web Services TLP to accept us as a subproject overseen by Web > > > Services PMC or merge back into Commons > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > dIon Gillard > > Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
