Erik Krause wrote: > David Brodsky wrote: > >> That may be true, but enfuse introduces "flare" around objects with sky >> as a background. I've made quick preview that can be visible on >> http://trekie.sinister.cz/enfuse.jpg > > Too less levels (as already pointed out in some other posts). And the
Yeah, that was my first attempt, but I can still blame Canon that it can't do more than 3 bracketed images at the same time. > tonemapped version has really awful colors. I guess this is a global > tonemapper, hence it doesn't produce halos like all local tonemappers > do. But I wonder why it produces such over-saturated colors. pfstmo_mantiuk08 with bit higher color saturation > Global tonemappers are limited to a relatively small dynamic range. Good > for a standard sunlit scene like this one but hopeless on interior shots > with sunlit exterior. On the other hand such sunlit scenes should be no > problem for a decent camera. It never was for analog film... Again - let's blame cameras' manufacturers :-) > For higher dynamic range only local tonmappers can give satisfactory > results but they tend to halos much more than enfuse does, which works > locally as well. But the exposure fusion algorithm can do much better as > tufuse shows. Tufuse isn't for Linux, is it? Anyway, what if I want to make hi-res hdr panos? I haven't found any software that works on Linux (other than enfuse/enblend) that can handle very large pictures without eating all available memory :-( Regards, D. Brodsky --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
