Hi, Peter Gawthrop wrote: > Hi David, > > just to add my thoughts. > > 1. I use --wExposure=1 --wSaturation=0 --wContrast=0 with enfuse to > minimise haloes.
same haloes :-( custom parameters: http://trekie.sinister.cz/enfuse3.jpg default: http://trekie.sinister.cz/enfuse4.jpg I cannot help myself but default looks bit better. > 2. Although I am a fan of enfuse (see "Image Blending with enfuse" > at http://www.lightspacewater.net/Tutorials/) there are times > when tonemapping works better. > > http://viewat.org/?hd=1&i=en&id_aut=139&id_pn=3210&sec=pn shows a > panorama composed of images preblended with enfuse from 6 2-stop > exposure bracketed jpegs -- parameters as in 1. That looks really nice > http://viewat.org/?hd=1&i=en&id_aut=139&id_pn=3226&sec=pn uses > the same inmages merged to hdr with Debvec's hdrmerge and Erik > Reinhard's tm_photographic. Is tm_photographic included in pfstmo? Or where can I find it? Regards, D. Brodsky > > Peter Gawthrop > [email protected] > http://www.lightspacewater.net > > > > > From: David Brodsky <[email protected]> > Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: HDR post processing. > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:36:57 +0100 > >> Hi, >> >> Erik Krause wrote: >>> D. Beynon wrote: >>> >>>> I have been spending some of my free time over the last few months >>>> working on a command line based HDRI processing/tone mapping toolkit >>> Is there really anyone using HDR tonemapping to get a viewable panorama >>> after there was enfuse? I see the necessity of HDR merging to get >>> panoramas for image based lighting, but I never saw a result of HDR >>> tonemapping (whatever algorithm) that surpasses an enfused result in >>> terms of natural appearance except maybe after long tweaking. >> That may be true, but enfuse introduces "flare" around objects with sky >> as a background. I've made quick preview that can be visible on >> http://trekie.sinister.cz/enfuse.jpg and >> http://trekie.sinister.cz/enfuse2.jpg (higher contrast). I've labelled >> parts of the image (source exp, enfuse and tonemap) and marked areas on >> which this effect can be seen. >> >> The tonemap part is just for comparison, I haven't tweaked it much. I >> don't like answering questions like: "Why does this building shines?" >> >> Is there an easy way to get rid of this effect? >> >> Regards, >> >> David Brodsky >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence >> http://www.netintelligence.com/email >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
