excerpts first:

Galloth <[email protected]> wrote:
 > I think it is stab in the back, because
 > I cannot explain myself to the other mentor.

A link to this post will be forwarded to the GSoC mentors list so that 
interested GSoC mentors can read the explanations.


 > I should have answer into hugin email list and than unsuscribe,
 > but now, I am not going to subscribe back

Done it for you. The mail, in its entirety as below, has been forwarded 
to hugin-ptx. The archives are world-readable, no need to be subscribed.

I have no further comment nor further wish to discuss with you.
Yuv

Galloth <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Yuv
> First I should explain why I am writing to you and not to hugin email
> list. That is because I unsubscribe from that list. You have right
> that I am not good for hugin comunity. I am going to explain it later
> in the email. I also think that you should read it all, because of the
> reason decribed later.
> 
> 2009/3/28, Yuval Levy <goo...@****.ch>:
>> Hello Jan,
>>
>> Galloth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> But I will not start programming until I will be selected, so I give
>>> up on hugin (which requires sending a patches) although I understand
>>> why you requiere it.
>>> But when you asked, I am interested. Is that topic still free? Should
>>> I write proposal even if I will work on hugin only after I got
>>> selected?
> 
> Did my email offend you? It was not the purpose and I do not see why.
>> We're not looking for mercenaries here, we are looking for committers to
>> join our community which is all about giving and not about taking.
> I am not a mercenary and I am little offend by that. I am person with
> more than one interests and hobies so I want to choose wisely, what to
> do. The fact, that google offers money is motivating that is true. But
> I am willing to do only jobs, that interests me.The fact I am not
> wiling to work for huggin before being selected does not mean that I
> am not wiling to do anything. Mostly it is an answer to your request,
> that student should do unnecesary work. At last that is how I see it.
> You require that students to do patches and wrote:
> 
> no worries about duplicate efforts.
> 
> for you it is a bug hunt, for the students it is about showing us that
> they can hack the code base. There is no requirement for the student
> patch to be useful or to be applied to the code base when considering
> them for GSoC.
> 
> So I as student should work why? Not for money, not to write useful
> code and therefore I do not want to write at all. When you asked about
> interested student, I replied because I was interested in the
> proposal, but I also told you, that I do not want to send these
> patches. Maybe I should write you why.
>> Selection for participation in Google Summer of Code is a privilege. We
>> are humbled by Google's generosity toward our project. We are equally
>> humbled by the generosity of all contributors to the community and by
>> the generosity of students who decide to apply.
> 
> Yes GSoC is a priviledge, but it should be because only best people
> are accepted. Therefore I would understand that you want to saw their
> code, to choose the best. and therefore I asked, if you are interested
> in my proposal even without me sending the patches, because If I do
> not send the code, you can not compare me with the others.
> 
> I do not agree with other parts of the paragraph, but it is my
> subjective opinion and probably the biggest problem at all.
> 
> I see GSoC as simply agreement. Students offers his time and work to
> some organization. Orgaization offers know how,interesting problems
> and open source oportunities. Goggle simply offers some publicity and
> a money. I myself think that publicity is more important. I would
> never hear of most of these interesting organizations there without
> GSoC.
> 
> 
>> The only feedback I can give specifically to the question you are asking
>> is that you are free to write a proposal and we will consider it like
>> every proposal.
> 
>> Potentially we could even accept you and get you started during the
>> community bonding period. And we could decide toward the end of the
>> community bonding period to ditch you for whatever reason. No money for
>> you then. And let's not forget that we could fail you at mid term and at
>> the end of the program.
> 
> When I fail with my job, than I am not going to get money. I do not
> know, why you writing it. Are you suggesting, that you took student,
> take his work and let him fail? I hope not, but it is how it looks to
> me. When I am writing proposal I think if it is interesting and if i
> am able to and wiling to do it. I do not even think about time so
> much. And therefore not about money. What if I choose proposal that
> will take me 6 months to complete or more? In this perspective,
> googles money are not so much. But as I wrote earlier, it is a
> motivation to start, not pay.
> 
>> And you know what? I'm not interested playing this kind of games.
>> Because from your statements I get the impression that once Summer of
>> Code is over you will disappear, and all my efforts and Google's money
>> will have been wasted on paying for some code that we could probably get
>> done faster, better, with less effort and money.
> 
> You got a wrong impression. If the community is nice and the problems
> are interesting, I will continue. Are you interested in my opinion
> about you? I think not, so I am not going to write about it.
> 
>> My interest is to attract people to stick around in the long term, to
>> see them growing. It's an investment. Like any investment, initially it
>> costs more than it yields. Over time it bear fruits.
> 
> It is the same for the student. During the GSoC one can evaluate how
> the community is and if he wants to continue to work with it.
> Sometimes it can be done a lot more faster, like now.
> 
>> Your post motivated me to look back, to see how the return on our
>> investment was.
>>
>> I am happy to see:
>>
>> * Ippei (2007) still active on the Mac build despite having joined the
>> workforce.
>>
>> * León (2007) still active on FreePV and applying to VLC this year to
>> add panorama playing capabilities there in a joint project that the two
>> organizations have tried to set up since last year.
>>
>> * Zoran (2007) went on mentoring in 2008 and is still around despite
>> being very busy in his new job.
>>
>> Out of five 2007 students that's not bad. Of the other two students one
>> was a superstar. Her code is great. She has moved on. The other one we
>> had to fail, but it was a good learning experience for both. He
>> completed his 2008 GSoC project with another organization successfully,
>> and we learn to introduce the patch requorement.
>>
>>
>> * Marko (2008) still around, integrated his code long after GSoC was over.
>>
>> * James (2008) still contributing fixes. Integrated his code long after
>> GSoC was over.
>>
>> * Tim (2008) ready to be a mentor or a student this year, depending what
>> occasion arises, and still contributing. Integrated his code long after
>> GSoC was over.
>>
>> * Fahim (2008) still active on his branch with the masking code. It's
>> our shortcoming that his code is not integrated in Hugin yet because we
>> do not really know how to evolve the user interface to make use of the
>> advanced tool he developed.
>>
>> * Onur (2008), who with Zoran has worked on one of the most demanding
>> projects of ours, and is still around but busy with his academic career.
>> Right now we'd need somebody to pull the strings together and bind his
>> project, with Zoran's 2007 project, into the Holy Grail of a patent-free
>> control points generator.
>>
>> Out of five 2008 students. Well, there was a sixth, together with VLC,
>> but he desisted because he got a full time job. We hope to catch up on
>> that project with León who is applying to VLC this year.
> 
> That is an impressive result. I am really fully surprised.
>> I rather give one of the slots available to a deserving student - to
>> somebody like Lukáš who was too young for GSoC 2007 and became a
>> frequent contributor and committer without expecting us to be accepted
>> as a GSoC 2008 mentoring organization and without expecting to be
>> selected. Or to one of the students who have shown interest, passion,
>> curiosity and humility (Dev, Irena, Joe, Yulia, and please forgive me if
>> I forgot somebody of those who joined this mailing list in the last week).
> 
> It si your right to choose and I wish them good luck. But Why should I
> write proposal if i do not have a chance of being accepted?
> 
>> And I rather give a slot back to Google for allocation to a more
>> deserving student at another project, than waste Google's money and the
>> time of my fellow mentors on somebody who does not seem mature enough in
>> my judgment.
> It is all same here, I am not going to give a slot, I am going to give
> my work to someone.
>> Wow, that was a long email! I felt angry when I started the reply. I
>> feel better now. Should I hit the "send" button? I think so. I am still
>> inclined to black-list you, but I may be wrong. Maybe you will see what
>> in your attitude is incompatible with this community? Feel free to come
>> back any time you want, the door is not closed. In the meantime I share
>> this exchange from our mailing list, conveniently stored at
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/e02061a1555edd56>
>> with the other mentoring organization. Just that they know who they are
>> dealing with in case you apply there too.
> 
> Well that is other part of it. I think it is stab in the back, because
> I cannot explain myself to the other mentor. I can explain them that
> my attitude could be different to their organization than to yours.
> (Right I should have answer into hugin email list and than unsuscribe,
> but now, I am not going to subscribe back do not worry). Because,
> hopefully, they would appriciate students work more than you.
> You are right I did not realized, that hugin email list is stored on
> the net. If I did, I would answer into the list, so my answer would be
> stored as well.
> 
> Jan
>> Yuv
>>
> 
> Jan Kastil
> [email protected]


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to