On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 13:56, Oskar Sander<[email protected]> wrote: > Did these controll points stand out looking at the list of control points, > or did you identify these in another way? > > I think control point quality the key to many experienced problems > (including mine!) and ways to help the user quickly identify problems and/or > the algorithms to weed out bad ones from start better is a good area with > respect to "bang for the bucks" on development.
After optimizing once with the simplest criteria, I looked at the list of all control points (pressing F3), sorted them by distance, and looked at the largest value. The image pair was loaded and I saw that in fact the three highest errors were on the same, completely erroneous, image pair. I deleted these three points, reoptimized, and the "flipping" disappeared. I then repeated this operation a few times. Perhaps we could merge ptograph with the average/median/max error between image pairs to make the wrong connections stand out? Cheers, Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
