Allan, Thanks.
I tried the JPEGs on my machine and just as you had found ... Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32 of them that were on the clouds. So then I created two 8-bit TIFF files and again Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32 of them that were on the clouds. So then I loaded the original 16-bit TIFF files and Auto-pano-sift again created 35 control points BUT this time Celeste removed only 9 of them. I took screen captures and can see no pattern. The screens are here http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/GR__BeforeCeleste.jpg?hl=en-GB&gsc=KotfnAsAAAAgkA1LQtdhBzYiUCK1XXkP and here: http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/GR_after1stCeleste.jpg?hl=en-GB&gsc=KotfnAsAAAAgkA1LQtdhBzYiUCK1XXkPand as I said I can’t see much pattern to the cloud-control-points removed and those that remain. So it seems that Celeste is not as good at removing control points on 16-bit TIFF images. all the best George On 7 Oct, 03:52, AKS-Gmail-IMAP <aksei...@gmail.com> wrote: > OSX hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 on this G4 removed all 64 control points > autopano-sift-c had matched on the clouds in your two jpg photos. > > Allan > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:00 PM, grow wrote: > > > > > > > OK, > > > Here they are: > > http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/5-of-9_IMG_0052.jpg?hl=en-GB > > http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/4-of-9_IMG_0049.jpg?hl=en-GB > > > As for the other error - the crashing Enblend running out of memory - > > I re-ran the stitch at 10,000 x 5,000 and it worked OK ... I can live > > with that. > > > all the best > > > George > > > On 7 Oct, 01:18, Yuval Levy <goo...@levy.ch> wrote: > >> hi George, > > >> try with high quality JPEG. if we can't reproduce the error, you can > >> always upload the heavier TIFFs in a second time. > > >> thanks for your effort > >> Yuv > > >> grow wrote: > >>> Bruno, > > >>>> Can you upload these two photos somewhere? > > >>> I am happy to do so ... at present they are 16-bit TIFF files and > >>> are > >>> each 70+Mb ... do you think that their size/resolution/TIFF-ness > >>> might > >>> would be significant? If so I can upload them onto one of my sites > >>> and provide a link ... if not and high-quality JPEGs would do I > >>> could > >>> make those and upload them here. > > >>> all the best > > >>> George > > >>> On Oct 6, 8:56 pm, Bruno Postle <br...@postle.net> wrote: > >>>> On Tue 06-Oct-2009 at 07:18 -0700, grow wrote: > > >>>>> This should probably have gone on a thread about Celetse ... > >>>>> but I am > >>>>> working on that panorama I mentioned with the current Beta and > >>>>> have > >>>>> found that I don't seem to to have the sort of clouds that > >>>>> Celeste > >>>>> recognises. > >>>> This could be a problem with celeste as you say, or something wrong > >>>> with the build or installation. Can you upload these two photos > >>>> somewhere? > > >>>> -- > >>>> Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
