Does a change to the Celeste parameters in preferences result in better performance for these images without removing desirable points? There are also people in these images. Sometimes they are also like clouds. By the way, from my perspective I am struck by the total absence of litter and excess body weight in these images.
Allan On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:55 AM, grow <george...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Allan, > > Thanks. > > I tried the JPEGs on my machine and just as you had found ... > Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32 > of them that were on the clouds. > So then I created two 8-bit TIFF files and again Auto-pano-sift > created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32 of them that were > on the clouds. > > So then I loaded the original 16-bit TIFF files and Auto-pano-sift > again created 35 control points BUT this time Celeste removed only 9 > of them. I took screen captures and can see no pattern. > > The screens are here > > http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/GR__BeforeCeleste.jpg?hl=en-GB&gsc=KotfnAsAAAAgkA1LQtdhBzYiUCK1XXkP > and here: > > http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/GR_after1stCeleste.jpg?hl=en-GB&gsc=KotfnAsAAAAgkA1LQtdhBzYiUCK1XXkPand > > as I said I can’t see much pattern to the cloud-control-points removed > and those that remain. > > So it seems that Celeste is not as good at removing control points on > 16-bit TIFF images. > > all the best > > George > > On 7 Oct, 03:52, AKS-Gmail-IMAP <aksei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > OSX hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 on this G4 removed all 64 control points > > autopano-sift-c had matched on the clouds in your two jpg photos. > > > > Allan > > > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:00 PM, grow wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, > > > > > Here they are: > > > > http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/5-of-9_IMG_0052.jpg?hl=en-GB > > > > http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/4-of-9_IMG_0049.jpg?hl=en-GB > > > > > As for the other error - the crashing Enblend running out of memory - > > > I re-ran the stitch at 10,000 x 5,000 and it worked OK ... I can live > > > with that. > > > > > all the best > > > > > George > > > > > On 7 Oct, 01:18, Yuval Levy <goo...@levy.ch> wrote: > > >> hi George, > > > > >> try with high quality JPEG. if we can't reproduce the error, you can > > >> always upload the heavier TIFFs in a second time. > > > > >> thanks for your effort > > >> Yuv > > > > >> grow wrote: > > >>> Bruno, > > > > >>>> Can you upload these two photos somewhere? > > > > >>> I am happy to do so ... at present they are 16-bit TIFF files and > > >>> are > > >>> each 70+Mb ... do you think that their size/resolution/TIFF-ness > > >>> might > > >>> would be significant? If so I can upload them onto one of my sites > > >>> and provide a link ... if not and high-quality JPEGs would do I > > >>> could > > >>> make those and upload them here. > > > > >>> all the best > > > > >>> George > > > > >>> On Oct 6, 8:56 pm, Bruno Postle <br...@postle.net> wrote: > > >>>> On Tue 06-Oct-2009 at 07:18 -0700, grow wrote: > > > > >>>>> This should probably have gone on a thread about Celetse ... > > >>>>> but I am > > >>>>> working on that panorama I mentioned with the current Beta and > > >>>>> have > > >>>>> found that I don't seem to to have the sort of clouds that > > >>>>> Celeste > > >>>>> recognises. > > >>>> This could be a problem with celeste as you say, or something wrong > > >>>> with the build or installation. Can you upload these two photos > > >>>> somewhere? > > > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Bruno > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
