On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 16:27, Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > [ ideas about the visualization of control points and distances ] > > Aha, I see either again I spoke spanish (optimistic) or you guys just > didn't like this idea :(
I would be tempted to give the same reply as Lukas, with the current Hugin trunk and the layout view. The thickness of the lines gives the number of control points between images, the color gives the quality of the control points. The great thing of this previewing mode is that it shows the images and their approximate position on the result. Double-clicking on an image pair loads the two images in the control point tab. See this image for more: http://www.flickr.com/photos/36383...@n00/4224767709/sizes/l/ You can clearly see where you are missing control points and which ones are bad. What is missing in this approach is the different metrics that you had in your proposal, i.e. maximum error or squared error. Speaking for myself, I get the maximum error by sorting the control point list (all images at the same time), so only the average or mean squared error is relevant. What do you not like from the current Hugin trunk approach? Best, Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
