Hi Thomas, I wish I could, but because of this issue I replaced all positive masks with negative equivalents in the other images. This evening I will try to construct a small example...
First I tried to sidestep the problem by drawing the positive mask as close to the border (within a few pixels) as possible. This tripped up enblend, resulting in a clearly visible line in the finished product. On Jul 12, 12:55 pm, "T. Modes" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I expected the positive masks to be clipped by the bounding box of the > > image. There was a thread about that some time ago. Has that function > > been sidetracked? > > The code should clip the mask at the bounding box of the image. I > thought, that I fixed these issues. But there were massive changes to > the code necessary to consider some cases related to fisheye images. > After it I did not seen any problems. > Maybe there has been introduced a small bug. Could you provide the > project file, so that I can have a look on this issue? (pto file is > sufficient) > > Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
