On 1 January 2011 16:33, Yuval Levy wrote: > > What advantage do you see in first blending the exposure layers and then > enfusing, rather than doing it the other way around (which is computationally > lighter)?
While I'm not Rick who was initially adressed above, I'd like to share a recent experience: Stitching a recent full sperical nighttime pano using 3 exposures (-2,0,+2) the blended and fused pano was a lot sharper than the fused and blended one. I haven't had the time to check with different panos yet. Currently I'm travelling and have no access to the pto and the images but I think I should be able to dig them out next week, if anybody should be interested. Happy New Year and congratulations for the release, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
