On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 07:29:28AM +0100, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> Am 22.01.2011 12:20, schrieb michael.grant:
>
> >Unless you do something like this, I can't see how hugin is going to
> >be able to create a pano any greater than the available swap space.
> >How difficult would it be to rework emblend to do something like the
> >above?
>
> Enblend can use temporary files (if compiled without OpenMP), and then
> can process very large images.
I'm not entirely sure that the imagecache code is bugfree. There were
a lot of bugs reported with crashing and/or image corruption when the
image cache code was enabled. IIRC I only got my last large project
stitched by having a shitload of RAM and disabling the imagecache....
Roger.
--
** [email protected] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
