Bruno Postle wrote:
On Sun 16-Jan-2011 at 06:10 -0800, kevin wrote:
For a real increase in speed with enblend it'd need to be designed so
that the problem it's solving can be broken into pieces that don't
require all the information of the entire image. That way when those
pieces are worked on by remote machines it wouldn't require all the
remote machines to have a large amount of main memory.
In any case, if it is required to send all images to all remote machines,
this may (of itself) cause an I/O bottle neck.
BugBear
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
